AI agent skill

Verification Before Completion

Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always

·

When to use this skill

Use Verification Before Completion when an AI agent needs a reusable SKILL.md workflow for this job: Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always

When not to use it

Skip Verification Before Completion when the task is outside the coding category, or when a more specific skill in this directory already covers the same workflow with clearer triggers.

How to install

  1. Personal install: create ~/.claude/skills/verification-before-completion/SKILL.md (and any bundled scripts) so Claude Code, Claude Desktop, and compatible agents can load it in every project.
  2. Project install: commit the same folder at .claude/skills/verification-before-completion/ so teammates get the skill with the repo.
  3. Restart the agent session after copying files so it re-scans the skills directory, then ask for the task in words that match the skill description.

Full install guide for Claude, Cursor, and Codex

What this skill does

# Verification Before Completion

## Overview

**Core principle:** Evidence before claims, always.

**Violating the letter of this rule is violating the spirit of this rule.**

## The Iron Law

``` NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE ```

If you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.

## The Gate Function

``` BEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction:

1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim? 2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete) 3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures 4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim? - If NO: State actual status with evidence - If YES: State claim WITH evidence 5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim

Skip any step = lying, not verifying ```

## Common Failures

| Claim | Requires | Not Sufficient | |-------|----------|----------------| | Tests pass | Test command output: 0 failures | Previous run, "should pass" | | Linter clean | Linter output: 0 errors | Partial check, extrapolation | | Build succeeds | Build command: exit 0 | Linter passing, logs look good | | Bug fixed | Test original symptom: passes | Code changed, assumed fixed | | Regression test works | Red-green cycle verified | Test passes once | | Agent completed | VCS diff shows changes | Agent reports "success" | | Requirements met | Line-by-line checklist | Tests passing |

## Red Flags - STOP

- Using "should", "probably", "seems to" - Expressing satisfaction before verification ("Great!", "Perfect!", "Done!", etc.) - About to commit/push/PR without verification - Trusting agent success reports - Relying on partial verification - Thinking "just this once" - Tired and wanting work over - **ANY wording implying success without having run verification**

## Rationalization Prevention

| Excuse | Reality | |--------|---------| | "Should work now" | RUN the verification | | "I'm confident" | Confidence ≠ evidence | | "Just this once" | No exceptions | | "Linter passed" | Linter ≠ compiler | | "Agent said success" | Verify independently | | "I'm tired" | Exhaustion ≠ excuse | | "Partial check is enough" | Partial proves nothing | | "Different words so rule doesn't apply" | Spirit over letter |

## Key Patterns

**Tests:** ``` ✅ [Run test command] [See: 34/34 pass] "All tests pass" ❌ "Should pass now" / "Looks correct" ```

**Regression tests (TDD Red-Green):** ``` ✅ Write → Run (pass) → Revert fix → Run (MUST FAIL) → Restore → Run (pass) ❌ "I've written a regression test" (without red-green verification) ```

**Build:** ``` ✅ [Run build] [See: exit 0] "Build passes" ❌ "Linter passed" (linter doesn't check compilation) ```

**Requirements:** ``` ✅ Re-read plan → Create checklist → Verify each → Report gaps or completion ❌ "Tests pass, phase complete" ```

**Agent delegation:** ``` ✅ Agent reports success → Check VCS diff → Verify changes → Report actual state ❌ Trust agent report ```

## When To Apply

**ALWAYS before:** - ANY variation of success/completion claims - ANY expression of satisfaction - ANY positive statement about work state - Committing, PR creation, task completion - Moving to next task - Delegating to agents

**Rule applies to:** - Exact phrases - Paraphrases and synonyms - Implications of success - ANY communication suggesting completion/correctness

Intended uses

  • Use Verification Before Completion when this documented workflow matches the task.

Related skills

Related skills in this directory, for comparison before you install another skill.

coding

Add Backend

Guide for adding a backend (Rust or Python) to the agent-sec-core security middleware. Use when creating new backends, integrating Rust or Python code into the security middleware, or extending with new backend actions.

View skill

coding

Agent Device

Drive iOS and Android devices for the Expensify App - testing, debugging, performance profiling, bug reproduction, and feature verification. Use when the developer needs to interact with the mobile app on a device.

View skill

Ranked Claude skills